| Titel: | Religion and reality: the three doubts of Hillel |
|---|---|
| Autor: | Nicholis, W und Kent, I |
| Mediengruppe: | journal article |
| Herausgeber: | --- |
| Zeitschrift: | Ment Health Soc; Mental Health & Society |
| Jahr: | 1975 |
| Band: | 2 |
| Heft: | 3-6 |
| Seiten: | 143 - 150 |
| Sprache: | englisch |
| Abstract: | The authors present an existential approach to the understanding of reality through an analysis of doubt. Doubt is understood as a healthy questioning of what others take for real, a search for that which will stand up to all criticism. Doubt begins in childhood, when one questions the authenticity of his parent's relationship to him. This doubt evokes anger, which normally leads to rebellion against or identification with the parents. Neither choice leads to personal authenticity or reality. Only the discovery of the true Self can heal this pain. There is a third choice possible, however, which takes account of another aspect of doubt, the one who doubts. When I doubt, I know that I don't know. Doubt then leads to the existential question, Who am I? This doubt is really faith, leading to Self-discovery. On the basis of this analysis, we re-open the old question of religion and reality. In predominantly religious cultures, the existential question, Who am I? has given rise to practical philosophies such as Yoga and Zen, together with their Western counterparts, the mysticisms associated with Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The same analysis of existential doubt as a path to the Self is to be found in Hillel's three questions. |